Peptide nucleic acids: Mechanism of tight binding and application in artificial nuclease

Peptide nucleic acids (PNA) are mimics of nucleic acids with a peptidic backbone. Duplexes and triplexes formed between PNA and DNA or RNA possess remarkable thermal stability, they are resistant to nuclease cleavage and can better discriminate mismatches. Understanding the mechanism for the tight binding between PNA and oligonucleotides is important for the design and development of better PNA-based drugs.^ We have performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of 8-mer PNA/DNA duplex and two analogous duplexes with chiral modification of PNA strand (D- or L-Alanine modification). MD simulations were performed with explicit water and Na$\sp{+}$ counter ions. The 1.5-ns simulations were carried out with AMBER using periodic boundary and particle mesh Ewald summation. The point charges for PNA monomers were derived from fitting electrostatic potentials, obtained from ab initio calculation, to atomic centers using RESP. Derived charges reveal significantly altered charge distribution on the PNA bases and predict the Watson-Crick H-bonds involving PNA to be stronger. Results from NMR studies investigating H-bond interactions between DNA-DNA and DNA-PNA base pairs in non-polar environment are consistent with this prediction. MD simulations demonstrated that the PNA strand is more flexible than the DNA strand in the same duplex. That this flexibility might be important for the duplex stability is tested by introducing modification into the PNA backbones. Results from MD simulation revealed dramatically altered structures for the modified PNA-DNA duplexes. Consistent with previous NMR results, we also found no intrachain hydrogen bonds between O7$\sp\prime$ and N1$\sp\prime$ of the neighboring residues in our MD study. Our study reveals that in addition to the lack of charge repulsion, stronger Watson-Crick hydrogen bonds together with flexible backbone are important factors for the enhanced stability of the PNA-DNA duplex.^ In a related study, we have developed an application of Gly-Gly-His-(Gly)$\sb3$-PNA conjugate as an artificial nuclease. We were able to demonstrate cleavage of single stranded DNA at a single site upon Ni(II) binding to Gly-Gly-His tripeptide and activation of nuclease with monoperoxyphthalic acid. ^

ADHERENS JUNCTIONS AND THE ACTOMYOSIN NETWORK REGULATE ORGAN GROWTH BY MODULATING HIPPO PATHWAY ACTIVITY IN DROSOPHILA

Adherens junctions (AJs) and basolateral modules are important for the establishment and maintenance of apico-basal polarity. Loss of AJs and basolateral module members lead to tumor formation, as well as poor prognosis for metastasis. Recently, in mammalian studies it has been shown that loss of either AJ or basolateral module members deregulate Yorkie activity, the downstream transcriptional effector of the Hippo pathway. Importantly, it is unclear if AJ and basolateral components act through the same or parallel mechanisms to regulate Yorkie activity. Here, we dissect how loss of AJ and basolateral components affects Hippo signaling in Drosophila. Surprisingly, while scrib knock-down tissue displays increased reporter activity autonomously, α-cat knock-down tissue shows a cell autonomous decrease and a cell non-autonomous increase of Hippo reporter activity. We provided several lines of evidence to show the differential regulation in polarity protein localizations and oncogenic cooperative overgrowth by AJs and basolateral complexes. Finally, we show that Hippo pathway activity is induced in α-cat and scrib double knocked-down tissue. Taken together, our results provide evidence to show that basolateral modules and AJs act in parallel to modulate Hippo pathway activity. Non-muscle myosin II is an actomyosin component that interacts with the actin. Non-muscle myosin II also interacts with lgl, though the function of this interaction is not clear. Our lab demonstrated that modulating F-actin regulates Hippo pathway activity, and lgl also has been described as a Hippo pathway regulator. Therefore we suspect that myosin II is also involved in Hippo pathway regulation. We first characterized non-muscle Myosin II as a novel tumor suppressor gene by affecting Hippo pathway activity. Upstream regulators of Myosin II, members in the Rho signaling pathway, also displayed similar phenotypes as the Myosin II knock-down tissues. Apoptosis is also induced in myosin II knock-down tissues, however, blocking cell death does not affect myosin II knock-down induced Hippo activation. Our data suggested hyperactivating myosin II induced F-actin accumulation so therefore induces Hippo target activation. Unexpectedly, we also observed that reducing F-actin activity induced Hippo target activation in vivo. These controversial data indicated that actomyosin may regulate the Hippo pathway through multiple mechanisms.